Toxic Shock Syndrome Nursing Diagnosis and Care Plan

Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) is a rare but life-threatening condition caused by bacterial toxins, primarily associated with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes.

This nursing diagnosis focuses on identifying, assessing, and managing patients with TSS, providing comprehensive care plans to address the multisystem effects of this severe condition.

Causes (Related to)

Toxic Shock Syndrome can result from various factors that allow toxin-producing bacteria to proliferate and release harmful toxins into the bloodstream. Common causes include:

• Prolonged use of highly absorbent tampons
• Presence of foreign bodies (e.g., nasal packing, surgical dressings)
• Skin wounds or burns colonized by toxin-producing bacteria
• Post-surgical infections
• Childbirth or abortion complications
• Use of contraceptive devices (e.g., diaphragms, contraceptive sponges)
• Systemic Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pyogenes infections

Signs and Symptoms (As evidenced by)

Toxic Shock Syndrome presents with a rapid onset of symptoms affecting multiple organ systems. The following signs and symptoms may be observed:

Subjective: (Patient reports)

• Sudden high fever
• Severe headache
• Muscle aches and joint pain
• Sore throat
• Nausea and vomiting
• Diarrhea
• Abdominal pain
• Confusion or disorientation

Objective: (Nurse assesses)

• Temperature > 102°F (38.9°C)
• Hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg)
• Tachycardia (heart rate > 110 beats per minute)
• Diffuse, erythematous, macular rash (resembling sunburn)
• Desquamation (skin peeling), especially on palms and soles (1-2 weeks after onset)
• Hyperemia of mucous membranes (e.g., conjunctival, pharyngeal, vaginal)
• Signs of organ dysfunction:
• Renal: Elevated creatinine, oliguria
• Hepatic: Elevated liver enzymes
• Hematologic: Thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
• Muscular: Elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK)
• Central nervous system: Altered mental status

Expected Outcomes

The following are common nursing care planning goals and expected outcomes for patients with Toxic Shock Syndrome:

• The patient will maintain stable vital signs within normal limits
• The patient will demonstrate improved organ function as evidenced by laboratory values
• The patient will show resolution of skin rash and no signs of new skin breakdown
• The patient will verbalize understanding of TSS prevention strategies

Nursing Assessment

A thorough nursing assessment is crucial for early detection and management of Toxic Shock Syndrome. The following assessments should be performed:

1. Monitor vital signs closely
   Assess temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate every 1-2 hours or as per facility protocol. TSS often presents with rapid changes in vital signs, particularly fever, hypotension, and tachycardia.
2. Perform a comprehensive skin assessment.
   Examine the entire body for the characteristic diffuse, erythematous rash. Pay special attention to mucous membranes, palms, and soles. Document any changes in skin integrity or signs of desquamation.
3. Assess neurological status
   Evaluate the level of consciousness, orientation, and presence of confusion or agitation. Changes in mental status may indicate cerebral involvement or worsening of the condition.
4. Monitor fluid balance
   Keep accurate intake and output records. Assess for signs of dehydration or fluid overload. TSS can lead to significant fluid shifts and electrolyte imbalances.
5. Evaluate respiratory function
   Assess respiratory rate, depth, and work of breathing. Monitor oxygen saturation levels. In severe cases, TSS can progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
6. Assess for signs of organ dysfunction.
   Monitor urine output, liver function tests, complete blood count, and coagulation studies. Early detection of organ involvement is crucial for timely intervention.

Nursing Interventions

Effective nursing interventions are crucial in managing Toxic Shock Syndrome and preventing complications. The following interventions should be implemented:

1. Provide hemodynamic support
   Administer intravenous fluids as ordered to maintain adequate blood pressure and tissue perfusion. Monitor for signs of fluid overload or electrolyte imbalances.
2. Assist with source control.
   As directed by the healthcare provider, help remove any potential sources of infection, such as tampons, nasal packing, or infected dressings.
3. Administer prescribed medications
   Give antibiotics as ordered, typically a combination of drugs covering Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species. Administer vasopressors if needed for persistent hypotension.
4. Implement infection control measures.
   To prevent the spread of infection, wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and follow isolation precautions as per facility protocol.
5. Provide skincare
   Implement measures to prevent skin breakdown, such as frequent repositioning and use of pressure-relieving devices. Gently cleanse the skin and apply moisturizers to manage desquamation.
6. Monitor and manage organ function.
   Assist with dialysis if needed for acute kidney injury. Support respiratory function with oxygen therapy or mechanical ventilation as required.
7. Manage pain and discomfort.
   Administer analgesics as prescribed and implement non-pharmacological pain management techniques.

Nursing Care Plans

The following nursing care plans address the aspects of caring for a patient with Toxic Shock Syndrome:

Care Plan 1: Ineffective Tissue Perfusion

Nursing Diagnosis: Ineffective Tissue Perfusion related to systemic inflammatory response and vasodilation secondary to Toxic Shock Syndrome as evidenced by hypotension, tachycardia, decreased urine output, and altered mental status.

Related factors/causes:

• Septic shock
• Systemic vasodilation
• Myocardial depression
• Hypovolemia

Nursing Interventions and Rationales:

1. Monitor vital signs, particularly blood pressure and heart rate, every 1-2 hours or more frequently if unstable.
   Rationale: Frequent monitoring allows for early detection of worsening shock and guides interventions.
2. Administer intravenous fluids, typically crystalloids like normal saline or lactated Ringer’s solution, as ordered.
   Rationale: Fluid resuscitation helps improve tissue perfusion and maintain adequate blood pressure.
3. Assist with the insertion and maintenance of central venous and arterial lines.
   Rationale: These lines allow for continuous hemodynamic monitoring and facilitate the administration of vasopressors if needed.
4. Administer vasopressors as prescribed (e.g., norepinephrine, vasopressin) and titrate according to hemodynamic goals.
   Rationale: Vasopressors help maintain blood pressure and organ perfusion in refractory shock.
5. Monitor urine output hourly and report if less than 0.5 mL/kg/hr.
   Rationale: Urine output is an indicator of renal perfusion and overall hemodynamic status.
6. Assess peripheral perfusion by checking capillary refill time, skin temperature, and color.
   Rationale: These assessments provide information about microcirculatory perfusion.
7. Position the patient with the head of the bed elevated 30-45 degrees unless contraindicated.
   Rationale: This position optimizes cerebral perfusion and reduces the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated patients.
8. Implement a sepsis protocol if available in your facility.
   Rationale: Standardized protocols have been shown to improve outcomes in septic shock.

Desired Outcomes:

• The patient will maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) > 65 mmHg
• The patient will demonstrate adequate urine output (> 0.5 mL/kg/hr)
• The patient will show improved mental status and level of consciousness
• The patient will exhibit warm extremities with capillary refill < 3 seconds

---

Care Plan 2: Hyperthermia

Nursing Diagnosis: Hyperthermia related to systemic inflammatory response secondary to Toxic Shock Syndrome as evidenced by temperature > 102°F (38.9°C), flushed skin, tachycardia, and diaphoresis.

Related factors/causes:

• Release of pyrogenic cytokines
• Increased metabolic rate
• Dehydration

Nursing Interventions and Rationales:

1. Monitor body temperature every 2-4 hours or more frequently if febrile.
   Rationale: Consistent monitoring allows for tracking the progression of fever and the effectiveness of interventions.
2. Administer antipyretic medications as prescribed (e.g., acetaminophen).
   Rationale: Antipyretics help reduce fever and improve patient comfort.
3. Apply cooling measures such as cool compresses or cooling blankets if the temperature exceeds 103°F (39.4°C).
   Rationale: External cooling methods can help lower body temperature when pharmacological interventions are insufficient.
4. Encourage oral fluids if the patient is alert and able to swallow safely.
   Rationale: Adequate hydration is crucial for temperature regulation and preventing fever complications.
5. Monitor for signs of dehydration (e.g., dry mucous membranes, decreased skin turgor, concentrated urine).
   Rationale: Fever increases fluid loss, putting the patient at risk for dehydration.
6. Provide light, breathable clothing and bedding.
   Rationale: Lightweight materials allow for better heat dissipation.
7. Monitor for signs of shivering and discontinue cooling measures if shivering occurs.
   Rationale: Shivering can increase metabolic rate and counteract cooling efforts.
8. Assess for signs of heat-related complications such as seizures or altered mental status.
   Rationale: High fever can lead to neurological complications that require immediate intervention.

Desired Outcomes:

• Patient will maintain body temperature within normal range (97.7°F – 99.5°F or 36.5°C – 37.5°C)
• The patient will report improved comfort levels
• The patient will demonstrate adequate hydration status
• The patient will exhibit no signs of heat-related complications

---

Care Plan 3: Risk for Impaired Skin Integrity

Nursing Diagnosis: Risk for Impaired Skin Integrity related to diffuse erythematous rash and potential for desquamation secondary to Toxic Shock Syndrome.

Related factors/causes:

• Toxin-mediated skin inflammation
• Prolonged bed rest
• Potential for edema and decreased tissue perfusion

Nursing Interventions and Rationales:

1. Perform a comprehensive skin assessment every shift, documenting the extent and characteristics of the rash.
   Rationale: Regular assessments allow for early detection of skin breakdown or changes in the rash pattern.
2. Implement a turning schedule, repositioning the patient every 2 hours or as tolerated.
   Rationale: Frequent repositioning reduces pressure on bony prominences and improves skin circulation.
3. Use pressure-relieving devices such as specialized mattresses or cushions.
   Rationale: These devices help distribute pressure and reduce the risk of pressure injuries.
4. Maintain skin hygiene with gentle cleansing using pH-balanced products.
   Rationale: Proper skin care helps maintain the skin’s protective barrier and prevents irritation.
5. Apply moisturizers to dry areas, especially during the desquamation phase.
   Rationale: Moisturizers help manage dryness and itching associated with skin peeling.
6. Elevate edematous extremities as appropriate.
   Rationale: Elevation helps reduce edema and improves circulation to the skin.
7. Monitor nutritional status and encourage a balanced diet rich in protein and vitamins.
   Rationale: Proper nutrition is essential for skin health and wound healing.
8. Educate the patient and family about skincare and reporting any new skin changes.
   Rationale: Patient and family involvement in skin care can help prevent complications and ensure early detection of problems.

Desired Outcomes:

• The patient will maintain intact skin without evidence of breakdown
• The patient will demonstrate proper skin care techniques
• The patient will exhibit an improved rash appearance and reduced inflammation
• The patient will show no signs of pressure injuries or complications from desquamation

---

Care Plan 4: Acute Pain

Nursing Diagnosis: Acute Pain related to systemic inflammatory response and muscle involvement secondary to Toxic Shock Syndrome as evidenced by patient reports of pain, grimacing, and guarding behavior.

Related factors/causes:

• Tissue inflammation
• Myalgia associated with TSS
• Potential organ involvement

Nursing Interventions and Rationales:

1. Assess pain using an appropriate pain scale every 4 hours and as needed.
   Rationale: Regular pain assessments guide pain management strategies and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.
2. Administer analgesics as prescribed, which may include opioids for severe pain.
   Rationale: Pharmacological pain management is often necessary for the significant discomfort associated with TSS.
3. Implement non-pharmacological pain management techniques such as repositioning, guided imagery, or relaxation exercises.
   Rationale: These techniques can complement medication and provide additional pain relief.
4. Apply hot or cold packs to painful areas as appropriate and tolerated.
   Rationale: Temperature therapy can help alleviate muscle pain and improve comfort.
5. Encourage adequate rest periods between activities.
   Rationale: Rest allows for muscle recovery and can reduce pain intensity.
6. Monitor for signs of adverse effects from pain medications, such as respiratory depression or constipation.
   Rationale: Early detection of side effects allows for timely intervention and adjustment of pain management strategies.
7. Educate the patient about pain management goals and the importance of reporting uncontrolled pain.
   Rationale: Patient education promotes active participation in pain management and ensures timely interventions.
8. Collaborate with the healthcare team to address underlying causes of pain, such as organ involvement or complications.
   Rationale: Treating the underlying cause of pain is essential for comprehensive pain management.

Desired Outcomes:

• The patient will report pain levels at 3/10 or less on the pain scale
• The patient will demonstrate the use of effective pain management techniques
• The patient will exhibit improved comfort and ability to participate in care activities
• The patient will show no signs of adverse effects from pain management interventions

---

Care Plan 5: Risk for Infection

Nursing Diagnosis: Risk for Infection related to invasive procedures, compromised skin integrity, and immune system dysfunction secondary to Toxic Shock Syndrome.

Related factors/causes:

• Presence of invasive devices
• Presence of invasive devices (e.g., central lines, urinary catheters)
• Compromised skin integrity due to rash and desquamation
• Immune system dysfunction associated with TSS
• Potential for nosocomial infections in the hospital setting

Nursing Interventions and Rationales:

• Implement strict hand hygiene practices and educate visitors on proper hand hygiene.
  Rationale: Hand hygiene is the most effective way to prevent the spread of infections.
• Use an aseptic technique for all invasive procedures and when handling invasive devices.
  Rationale: The aseptic technique reduces the risk of introducing pathogens into sterile sites.
• Assess insertion sites of all invasive devices daily for signs of infection (redness, swelling, discharge).
  Rationale: Early detection of local infections allows for prompt intervention.
• Change dressings and perform site care for invasive devices according to facility protocol.
  Rationale: Regular care of invasive device sites helps prevent colonization and infection.
• Administer prophylactic antibiotics as prescribed.
  Rationale: Prophylactic antibiotics may be necessary to prevent secondary infections in high-risk patients.
• Monitor laboratory values, particularly white blood cell count and inflammatory markers.
  Rationale: These values can indicate the development or progression of infection.
• Implement isolation precautions as appropriate based on the causative organism of TSS.
  Rationale: Proper isolation prevents the spread of infection to other patients and healthcare workers.
• Encourage proper nutrition and hydration to support the immune system.
  Rationale: Adequate nutrition is essential for optimal immune function and wound healing.
• Educate the patient and family about signs of infection and the importance of reporting any new symptoms promptly.
  Rationale: Patient and family education promotes early detection of potential infections.
• Ensure all equipment used for patient care is properly cleaned and disinfected.
  Rationale: Proper cleaning of equipment prevents cross-contamination between patients.

Desired Outcomes:

• The patient will remain free from new infections during the hospital stay
• The patient will demonstrate an understanding of infection prevention strategies
• The patient will show no signs of infection at invasive device sites
• The patient will maintain white blood cell count and inflammatory markers within normal limits

Conclusion

Toxic Shock Syndrome is a severe, life-threatening condition that requires prompt recognition and comprehensive nursing care. By implementing these nursing care plans and interventions, nurses can be crucial in improving patient outcomes and preventing complications associated with TSS.

Early detection of symptoms, aggressive shock management, meticulous skin care, pain control, and rigorous infection prevention measures are components of successful TSS management.

Healthcare providers need to maintain a high index of suspicion for TSS, especially in patients with recent tampon use, surgical procedures, or skin infections. Ongoing education for healthcare professionals and the public about TSS’s risk factors and prevention strategies is essential in reducing the incidence of this potentially fatal condition.

References

1. Burnham, J. P., & Kollef, M. H. (2015). Understanding toxic shock syndrome. Intensive Care Medicine, 41(9), 1707-1710.
2. DeVries, A. S., Lesher, L., Schlievert, P. M., Rogers, T., Villaume, L. G., Danila, R., & Lynfield, R. (2011). Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome 2000–2006: epidemiology, clinical features, and molecular characteristics. PLoS One, 6(8), e22997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022997
3. Gottlieb, M., Long, B., & Koyfman, A. (2018). The evaluation and management of toxic shock syndrome in the emergency department: a review of the literature. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 54(6), 807-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.048
4. Herdman, T. H., & Kamitsuru, S. (Eds.). (2018). NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions & Classification 2018-2020. Thieme.
5. Low, D. E. (2013). Toxic shock syndrome: major advances in pathogenesis, but not treatment. Critical Care Clinics, 29(3), 651-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2013.03.012
6. Medina, H., & Miller, L. G. (2021). Toxic Shock Syndrome. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459345/
7. Schmitz, G. R., & Bruner, D. (2016). Toxic Shock Syndrome. Emergency Medicine Reports, 37(16). https://www.reliasmedia.com/articles/138243-toxic-shock-syndrome
8. Silversides, J. A., Lappin, E., & Ferguson, A. J. (2010). Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome: mechanisms and management. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 12(5), 392-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-010-0119-y
9. Waddington, C. S., Darton, T. C., & Pollard, A. J. (2018). The challenge of enteric fever. Journal of Infection, 76, S1-S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2017.09.010
10. Young, A. E., & Thornton, K. L. (2007). Toxic shock syndrome in burns: diagnosis and management. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Education and Practice, 92(4), ep97-ep100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.104372